|
Key Studies,
Collaborators and Publications

Press Telegram -- Martha Cota --
Member of LBACA "Mayor Foster Took a Wrong Turn on the Road
to Clean Air"
  
Click here to read "When dirty air
gets personal"
By Laura Rodriguez -- September
2007.
Click here for more articles on
"Is world trade a poison apple"

Danger
At Sea:
Ships Draw Fire For Rising Role In Air Pollution --- As
Global Trade Grows, So Does the Spewing Of Noxious Emissions
The Trade, Health & Environment Impact
Project, also referred to as THE Impact Project, is a
community-academic partnership focused on reducing the
impacts of international trade on health and community
life. Funded by The California Endowment, THE Impact
Project began its formal collaboration in the spring of
2006; however, many of the partners have been working
together on goods movement-related issues in Southern
California for years.
.
Click
to for more information
THE Impact Project website will
serve as a network for communities and researchers alike to
find useful news links, resources, and information about our
upcoming
"Moving Forward"
Conference.
Port
Communities: Bill of Rights
Click
to read the CFASE Bill of Rights.

Harboring Pollution: The
Dirty Truth about U. S. Ports, March 2004
Click
to read article.
Download PDF
Toxic Air: How the Ports Contribute to Pollution in the L.A.
Basin.
Click
to read article.



California Breathing, a
program of the California Department of Public Health,
is pleased to announce the release of a comprehensive
data source book on asthma entitled,
The Burden of Asthma in
California: A Surveillance Report. To view
the report, use this link-
http://tinyurl.com/2cpcpz -
or visit
www.californiabreathing.org. This report
presents a comprehensive picture of the burden of asthma
in the state and is the first major compilation of all
available asthma surveillance data in a single source.
It serves to provide a framework for asthma education,
interventions, and policy in California.
The Burden of Asthma in
California
provides asthma rates by ethnicity, age, and county, and
demonstrates how California compares to national goals.
It also presents data on quality of life factors
associated with asthma, the impact of asthma on school
children, asthma in the workplace, and the presence of
asthma risk factors including obesity and exposure to
tobacco smoke.
|
Outdoor Air Pollution
While air pollution has long been
accepted as an asthma trigger, recent research shows that it
is likely to be involved in the causation of asthma,
demonstrating that the health impacts of outdoor air
pollution for children living in Long Beach and its
surrounding communities are real. Long Beach is part of the
Southern California Air Basin, which, despite significant
improvements, remains in violation of the National Ambient
Air Quality Standard specified by the Clean Air Act (CAA).
The
American Lung Association’s State of the Air, 2006
which provides a county-level report card on the two most
pervasive air pollutants, ozone (smog) and particle
pollution (soot), listed Los Angeles-Long Beach as the place
in the United States with the highest number of days with
high air pollution, giving it a grade F.
Because of the universal impact that air pollution has on
children’s health in Long Beach, LBACA works to prevent
pollution from the largest sources in our region—the Ports
of Los Angeles and Long Beach and the “goods movement
system.”
Long Beach and the surrounding communities are particularly
affected by the ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles and the
related goods movement activity. These neighborhoods lie
within the wind corridor most affected by harbor, industry,
freeway and refinery pollutants and the 710 freeway runs
through the heart of these neighborhoods carrying more than
47,000 truck trips each weekday to and from the third
largest port complex in the world.
For more information about port pollution and their impacts
please see:
Natural Resources Defense Council and Coalition for Clean
Air. Harboring Pollution: The Dirty Truth
about U.S. Ports, March 2004
Long Beach Press Telegram 8-part series entitled: “Toxic
Air: How the Ports Contribute to Pollution in the L.A. Basin
Health Impacts of Goods Movement
According to the University of Southern California’s
Children’s Health Study, which was conducted over 10 years
in 12 communities with 6,000 children in southern
California, Long Beach had the highest levels of elemental
carbon, a marker for diesel exhaust, of all 12 communities.
Diesel exposure is associated with numerous immune system
responses in humans and animals culminating in increased
allergic inflammatory responses and suppression of infection
fighting ability. Long Beach also had the third highest
levels of nitrogen dioxide. Not only has a relationship been
established between nitrogen dioxide exposure, respiratory
tract symptoms and asthma exacerbation, but exposure to NO2
has also been found to enhance allergic responses. Long
Beach had the fifth highest PM 2.5 exposure. Elevated levels
of both ozone and particulate matter have been shown to
increase missed school days and hospitalization rates. And
finally, six percent of children tested in Long Beach have
less than 80% of their normal lung function, compared to no
children with impaired lung function in less polluted
communities. Clinically significant lung function deficits
predict future health problems and even premature death.
The California Air Resource
Board (CARB) conducted a thorough analysis of the health and
financial impacts of the goods movement operations
throughout the state of California. In their
Emission Reduction Plan,
the following health impacts were attributed to Ports and
Goods Movement in California:
-
2400 premature deaths
annually, mostly from particulate pollution,
-
2000 hospital admissions
(respiratory causes),
-
830 hospital admissions
(cardiovascular causes),
-
62,000 Asthma and Other
Respiratory Symptoms,
-
360,000 Lost Work Days, and
-
1,100,000 School Absence
Days.
The 710 “Story”
LBACA’s involvement in Outdoor Air Pollution policy work
started when community members became aware of a local
freeway expansion project, the I-710, which runs through the
heart of the community, was proposed.
LBACA has been working with the Community Partners Council
(CPC), a group of community residents from downtown Long
Beach and representatives from community organizations,
agencies and local government, to bring the community’s
voice to the I-710 expansion debate. In 2001, the I-710
Oversight Policy Committee (OPC) undertook the task of
investigating the possibility of “improving” the 710
freeway. Two years later, this committee had narrowed the
field to 5 possible alternatives and would make their final
decision on a locally preferred alternative within months,
despite very little input from the community and no input
from the neighborhoods to be the most impacted by the
elimination of homes, churches, parks, and schools and
increased air pollution. The “health voice” was noticeably
absent from the debate as well, with little discussion of
the potential health effects of increased diesel truck
traffic on the 710. One goal of the freeway expansion is to
accommodate the anticipated three-fold increase in cargo
entering the port by 2020.
Many of the LBACA and CPC members live in the neighborhoods
that would be directly impacted by a freeway expansion and
have children with asthma. When they attended a meeting
hosted by the I-710 OPC they found many obstacles. First,
the meeting was held later in the day and ran late into the
night. Many of the members found that they had to leave the
meeting early so that they could get their children to bed.
Many of the members did not have childcare or
transportation, so they could not attend the meetings. Many
of the meetings were held in locations that were either far
away or difficult to get to by foot. Very technical language
was used to explain the alternatives, even for an English
speaker, and interpretation, when available, was poor. When
these obstacles were mentioned to the OPC, no changes were
implemented. LBACA and CPC felt that this information had to
get to the community so they decided to co-host a community
forum in May 2003.
At the LBACA and CPC community forum, there was
transportation, childcare, food, and interpretation
provided, but most of all, plenty of time to understand the
message. There were over 60 persons in attendance. The I-710
committee was invited to present on the 5 alternatives under
consideration. Ed Avol from the University of Southern
California Occupational and Environmental Health Department
at the Keck School of Medicine was also invited to present
on the “10-year study on Respiratory Health and Air
Pollution.” The LBACA and CPC members have continued to
attend I-710 OPC meetings, City of Long Beach 710 Community
Advisory Committee meetings and plan strategy sessions of
their own to ensure their concerns are heard. Because of
their continuous efforts, several new practices have been
instituted.
-
A 2-tiered Community
Advisory Committee was formed by the OPC, on which both
LBACA and the CPC had a sitting member
-
City of Long Beach Advisory
Committee on the I-710 Meetings were held earlier in the
day and end at 8:30 pm.
-
The Tier I Committee drew up
a plan from scratch to “improve” the highway and this
plan will eliminate only a handful of homes, will
actually grow park space, will not eliminate any
schools, and would involve only a ½ mile of double
decking. This is not the final plan.
-
The Tier 2 Committee met
monthly for one year and the final result was a fully
vetted community document known as the
I-710 Major Corridor Study, Tier 2 Community Advisory
Committee: Major Opportunity/Strategy Recommendations
and Conditions.
LBACA and CPC as part of a
larger coalition of environmental health, community based,
environmental justice and legal groups continue to work to
encourage the governing bodies to include the
recommendations of the Tier 2 report. These include:
-
Air Quality Action Plan: A
“near-term” air quality plan designed to improve
corridor air quality prior to the start of construction
-
Include community
participation corridor wide throughout the project
implementation
-
Include a thorough analysis
of alternatives to freeway expansion for improvement of
throughput, rather to consider alternative forms of
goods movement for the trucks clogging the I-710
freeway.
(See http://www.gatewaycog.org/i710.html
for more information about the status of the I-710
freeway project)
|